Gopichand Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 2595 of 2017 Gopichand Thakur S/o Jethan Thakur Aged About 27 Years CasteGond, R/o Village- Dulla, Police Station & Post Office- Chhura, DistrictGariyaband, Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police StationChhura, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For applicant Mr. Shivendu Pandya, Adv.

For Respondent/State Mr. Vasim Miyan, PL.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order On Board 9/5/2017

1. Heard finally.

2. The applicant has preferred this application for grant of bail as he is arrested on 30-3-2017 in connection with Crime No. 43/2017 registered in PS Chhura, Civil Distt. Raipur (CG) for offence punishable under Section 34 sub-section (2) of the CG Excise Act.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that charge sheet is not filed, the applicant is remanded by the CJM Gariyaband. He is the first offender. He will not commit any offence in future if granted bail. He may be granted bail as the trial may take time. As per allegation, he was carrying 5.275 bulk litre liquor in a motorcycle bearing registration No. CG 04 LC 9318. Police seized the said liquor and the motorcycle.

4. Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the bail application. However he fairly conceded that no criminal antecedent of the applicant is reported by the police in the case diary.

5. Perused the matter.

6. On due consideration, as the applicant is the first offender, he is in jail since 1 month and 11 days and as submitted he will not commit any

offence in future, I am inclined to grant one opportunity to the applicant to live peacefully in the society without committing any crime. Consequently, instant MCRC is allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one solvent surety of the like sum to the satisfaction of the CJM Gariyaband for his appearance before the said Court regularly as and when directed by the said Court.

7. It is made clear that this order granting bail to the applicant shall stand cancelled automatically without reference to the bench by the Court below if (i) the trial Court finds that the applicant suppressed filing or pendency of any other application for grant of bail before this court or the Hon'ble Apex Court intentionally, (ii) the applicant does not cooperate in the trial; (iii) the applicant is found to be involved in any offence of the like nature: (iv) the trial Court finds that the applicant remains absent without any sufficient and cogent reason. If bail is cancelled automatically in view of above, the Court below may proceed further under the provisions of law under intimation.

8. CC as per rules.

Sd/- (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) Judge Pathak