← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3760/2015disposed off

Santosh Sonwani v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-10-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3760 of 2015

1. Santosh Sonwani S/o Late Shri Gayalal Sonwani Aged About 30 Years Occu- Presently Posted As Assistant Sub- Inspector ( M), Working Under The Office Of Superintendent Of Police Bemetara, P. S. Bemetara, District Bemetara (Chhattisgarh)

2. Atul Son, S/o Shri Ramswarup Son, Aged About 24 Years OccuPresently Posted As Assistant Sub- Inspector ( M), Working Under The Office Of Superintendent Of Police Bemetara, P. S. Bemetara, District Bemetara (Chhattisgarh)

3. Lumeshwar Dewangan, S/o Shri Bharatlal Dewangan Aged About 30 Years Occu- Presently Posted As Assistant Sub- Inspector ( M), Working Under The Office Of Superintendent Of Police Bemetara, P. S. Bemetara, District Bemetara (Chhattisgarh)

4. Mahendra Kumar Bhuarya, S/o Shri Shiv Prasad Bhuarya, Aged About 30 Years Occu- Presently Posted As Assistant Sub- Inspector ( M), Working Under The Office Of Superintendent Of Police Bemetara, P. S. Bemetara, District Bemetara (Chhattisgarh)

5. Pravin Kumar Lohle S/o Shri Chandrashekhar Lohle Aged About 25 Years Accu- Presently Posted As Assistant Sub- Inspector ( M), Working Under The Office Of Superintendent Of Police Bemetara, P. S. Bemetara, District Bemetara (Chhattisgarh)

6. Ajay Kumar Dewangan, S/o Shri Tulsiram Dewangan Aged About 30 Years Occu- Presently Posted As Assistant Sub- Inspector ( M), Working Under The Office Of Superintendent Of Police Bemetara, P. S. Bemetara, District Bemetara (Chhattisgarh)

7. Shrimati Rahi Yadav, W/o Shri Dayalu Yadav Aged About 24 Years Occu- Presently Posted As Assistant Sub- Inspector ( M), Working Under The Office Of Superintendent Of Police Bemetara, P. S. Bemetara, District Bemetara (Chhattisgarh)

8. Tamradhwaj Deshmukh, S/o Late Shri Kanwal Singh Deshmukh Aged About 36 Years Occu- Presently Posted As Head Constable ( M), Working Under The Office Of Superintendent Of Police Bemetara, P. S. Bemetara, District Bemetara (Chhattisgarh)

9. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta S/o Bihari Prasad Gupta Aged About 33 Years Occu- Ex. Assistant Sub - Inspector ( M) Office Of D I G ( C A F) North Region Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Home Affairs, Police Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Secretary, Finance, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Naya

Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Director General Of Police, Police Headquarters, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Shri Indrasen Sahu, Advocate.

For Respondent/State : Shri Prasoon Bhaduri, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker Order On Board 15/10/2015 The matter relates to grant of pay fixation to the petitioners. Counsel for the petitioners submit that number of identical writ petitions have been disposed of by this Court vide order dated 03.07.2015 passed in W.P.(S) Nos.4523/2014 and other connected matters and therefore this matter may also be disposed of in the same terms. State counsel has no objection if the present petition is also disposed of in terms of the previous order passed by this Court. Ordered accordingly. The present petition is also disposed of in the following terms:

• The Department of Home, Government of Chhattisgarh shall constitute a committee consisting of senior IPS Officers not below the rank of ADGP and a senior officer of the Finance Department not below the rank of Additional Secretary.

• The petitioners shall submit a representation before the said committee within a period of one month from today.

• The committee shall examine the issue as to whether the respective cases of the petitioners are similar to that of the petitioners whose petitions have been decided by this Court on 07.05.2009 (Abdul Nawab Khan & Others Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & Others). If the

petitioners are similar to those petitioners, they shall be entitled to all such benefits which are admissible to those petitioners on the subject issue.

It is made clear that this Court has not observed anything on merits and the authority concerned would be at liberty to act in accordance with law. Sd/- Pritinker Diwaker Judge suguna