Sujit Singh Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No.7832 of 2021
1. Sujit Singh Thakur S/o Gulab Singh Thakur, Aged About 22 Years R/o Nutan Chauk, Sarkanda, Indira Vihar Gate, Atal Awas- F- Block-8, P.S. Sarkanda, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
2. Rakesh Yadav S/o Ramesh Yadav, Aged About 28 Years R/o Nutan Chauk, Sarkanda, E-Block-1, Atal Awas, P.S. Sarkanda, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicants
Versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh Through P. S. Seepat, District and Revenue District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Applicants Mr. B. P. Singh, Advocate For Respondent Mr. Devesh Verma, GA Hon'ble Justice Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari Order On Board 26/10/2021 1.
The applicants have preferred this first bail application under Section 439 of CrPC for grant of bail, as they are arrested in connection with Crime No.419/2021, registered at Police Station Seepat, District Bilaspur for the offence punishable under Section 392 read with Section 34 of IPC. 2.
The case of the prosecution in brief is that on 03.09.2021 at 12:30 pm, when the complainant was returning on his motorcycle from Seepat to Mopka, near Janji Kali Mandir three
unknown persons came in bike and looted cash of Rs.15,000/- and his mobile phone.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in the crime in question. He further submits that there is no criminal antecedents of the applicants and there is no chance of their absconding. The applicants are in jail since 07.09.2021 and the trial is likely to take some time, therefore, the applicants may be released on bail.
4.
On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the bail application.
5.
I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary.
6.
Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of the offence, further considering the seriousness of the offence and for the fact that in the identification parade, the complainant has properly identified the accused persons, I am not inclined to release the applicants on bail.
7.
Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed. Sd/- Deepak Kumar Tiwari Judge Nirala