Sanjay And ANR. v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Misc. Criminal Case No.2783 of 2017
1. Sanjay S/o Ganpati, Aged About 25 Years Cast Marar, R/o Village Potapara, Police Station And Tahsil Basna, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh
2. Shiv Prasad, S/o Gayaram, Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Potapara, Police Station And Tahsil Basna, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ---- Applicants
Versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Basna, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Applicant : Shri Vikash Pradhan, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order On Board 16.5.2017 Heard the matter finally.
2.
This is an application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the applicants, who have been arrested in connection with Crime No.123/2017 registered in Police Station Basna, Distt. Mahasamund for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been arrested on 30.3.2017, charge sheet is not yet filed and the applicants have been remanded by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mahasamund. The applicants are the first offenders, as per the allegation, police has seized 9.00 bulk liters of liquor along with
motor cycle bearing registration No.CG 06 KS 4722 from the joint possession of the applicants. The applicants will not commit any offence in future, as the trial may take sometime for its conclusion, they may be granted bail.
4.
Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposes arguments advanced on behalf of the applicants and would fairly submit that there is no criminal antecedent reported against the applicants. 5.
Perused the entire material.
6.
On due consideration of the fact that the applicants are in jail for one month and eighteen days, charge sheet is not yet filed, the trial may take sometime for its conclusion, the applicants are the first offenders and also on due consideration of the quantity of liquor so seized in the joint possession of the applicants and seizure of the motor cycle, I am inclined to grant one last opportunity to the applicants, so that they shall not commit any similar or other offence in future.
7.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed.
8.
It is directed that the applicants shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- each with one solvent surety of like sum to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mahasamund for their appearance before the said Court as and when directed.
9.
It is made clear that this order granting bail to the applicants shall stand cancelled automatically without reference to the Bench by the Cort below if (i) the trial Court finds that the applicants
suppressed filing or pendency of any other application for grant of bail before this Court or the Hon'ble Apex Court intentionally; (ii) the applicants do not cooperate in the trial; (iii) the applicants are found to be involved in any offence of the like nature; and (iv) the trial Court finds that the applicants remain absent without any sufficient and cogent reason. If bail is cancelled automatically in view of the above, the Court below may proceed further under the provisions of law, under intimation.
Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/- (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) JUDGE Bini