← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6025/2019disposed off

Yoglal Ramteke v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-08-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6025 of 2019 Yoglal Ramteke S/o Late Dayaram Ramteke Aged About 46 Years Resident Of Ward No. 5, Parmeshwari Nagar A.Chowki, Tah. A.Chowki, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

3. The Chief Medical And Health Officer Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

4. The Block Medical And Health Officer A.Chowki, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

5. The Block Medical And Health Officer Manpur, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Love Kumar Ramteke, Advocate For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 13/08/2019 1.

The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 12.07.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Sub Health Centre, Aadejhar, Block A. Chowki, District Rajnandgaon to Sub Health Centre Sarkheda, Block Manpur, District Rajnandgaon. 2.

Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on his being transferred and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

-23.

Not opposed.

4.

Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved