← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2061/2016dismissed

Smt. Priti Bajpai @ Priti Shukla v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-03-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1- NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 2061 OF 2016 1.

Smt. Priti Bajpai @ Priti Shukla W/o. Shri Suresh Shukla, Aged About 31 Years Working As Lecturer, Department Of Mechanical, Govt Polytechnic College, Mahasamund, Distt. Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh) 2.

Smt. Deepa Gupta, W/o Shri Akshat Kumar Gupta, Aged About 29 Years Working As Lecturer, Department Of I.T., Principal, Government Engineering College, Koni, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 3.

Smt. Babita Yadav, W/o Shri Mrityunjay Yadav, Aged About 30 Years Presently Working As Lecturer, Branch Science And Humanities (Chemistry), Govt. Polytechnic College, Baikunthpur, Distt. Korea (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Technical Education, Man Power And Planning Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, P.S. Rakhi, Distt. Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2.

The Director, Directorate Of Technical Education, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3.

The Public Service Commission, Through The Secretary, P.S.C., Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondents For Petitioner :

Ms. Madhunisha Singh, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Mr. Adhiraj Surana, Dy. Govt. Advocate.

For Respondent-CGPSC :

Mr. Gokulanand Meher, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 17/03/2017 1.

The Petitioners in the present writ petition have claimed for regularization of their services on the post of Lecturer. 2.

The grievance raised by the Petitioners in the present petition has already been answered by this Court in a bunch of writ petitions decided on 2.1.2017, the lead case being Writ Petition (S) No. 1656 of 2016. 3.

In view of the fact that all the grounds and issues raised in the present writ petition have already been answered by this Court in the order dated 2.1.2017, this Court does not find any strong ground made out for keeping the present writ petition pending and therefore this petition also stands decided in similar terms as has been decided in Writ Petition (S) No. 1656 of 2016 and other connected writ petitions decided on 2.1.2017.

-24.

The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) /sharad/ JUDGE