Chandra Kumar Banchhor v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.5580 OF 2018

1. Chandra Kumar Banchhor S/o Chiranjiv Lal Banchhor, Aged About 47 Years Working As Lecturer ( Panchayat ) At Government Higher Secondary School, Datan ( Khaira ) Block Palari, District Baloda BazarBhatapara Chhattisgarh.

2. Smt. Anita Ogare W/o Same Lal Ogare Aged About 36 Years Working As Teacher ( Panchayat ) At Government Middle School, Nagedi, Block Kasdol, District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.,

3. Smt. Mongara Dhruw W/o Mahesh Ram Dhruw Aged About 35 Years Working As Teacher ( Panchayat ) At Government Middle School, Bagar, Block Kasdol District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.,

4. Rohit Kumar Kanwar S/o Ganesh Ram Kanwar Aged About 40 Years Working As Lecturer ( Panchayat ) At Government Higher Secondary School, Asneed, Block Kasdol, District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.,

5. Smt. Sucheta Tiwari W/o F C Tiwari, Aged About 52 Years Working As Lecturer ( Panchayat ) At Government Higher Secondary School Kusmi, Block Palari, District Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.,

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners :

Ms. Chhaya Gabel, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Shri SP Kale, Dy. Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 29.08.2018 1.

Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the

benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post. 2.

In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioner(s) shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by him / her on a lower post or on the same post. 3.

No order as to costs.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy Judge inder