Mangedar Ram Paikra v. Shri B.S. Nayak

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 920 of 2018 Mangedar Ram Paikra S/o Gudduram Paikra Aged About 64 Years Occupation Retired Sub Registrar, Sub Treasury Bilaigarh, R/o Bangalipara, Ward No. 6, Bilaigarh, Police Station Bilaigarh, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

Shri B.S. Nayak District Registrar, Registrar Office, Collectorate Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For petitioner :

Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate.

For Respondent :

Shri R. K. Gupta, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 09/01/2019 1.

The present contempt has been filed alleging non compliance of the order dated 29/06/2017 passed in WPS No. 2736/17 while disposing off the writ petition this Court had made following observations:- "Considering the total facts and circumstances of the case, as has also not been opposed by the Learned Counsel for the State, this Court is of the opinion that the ends of justice would meet if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Respondents No. 1 and 2 to take appropriate decision on the reimbursement of medical bills raised by the Petitioner promptly at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order by the Petitioner before them."

2.

After the contempt was filed, this Court has issued notice to the respondents. The respondents have now come up with reply making their submissions that the petitioner though had submitted his bills but the same were either not in the required form or were not proper bills as is required by the respondent authorities. Counsel for the respondents submits that subject to the petitioner submitting proper bills and completing the formalities the dues payable to the petitioner towards medical reimbursement shall be considered.

3.

Given the said submissions by the counsel for the respondent this Court is of the opinion that no contempt as such is made out of the said order. It is expected that subject to the petitioner fulfilling the requisite formalities for release of the medical reimbursement the respondents shall promptly scrutinize the same and take appropriate steps.

4.

The contempt petition accordingly stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Rohit JUDGE