← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4243/2016disposed off

Pramod Shukla v. Union Of India

2017-10-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No.4243 of 2016 • Pramod Shukla S/o Shri Hetram Shukla, Aged About 59 Years R/o Village Saliyapara, Post Pali, Korba, District Korba (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Union Of India Through Department Of Personnel And Training, Ministry Of Personnel, Public Grievances And Pensions, 3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi 110003

2. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Capital Complex, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. State Of Madhya Pradesh, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Vallabh Bhawan, Mantralaya, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh)

4. State Of Madhya Pradesh, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of General Administration, Vallabh Bhawan, Mantralaya, Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri Manish Nigam, PL For Respondent-UOI :

Shri R. K. Kesharwani, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 10/10/2017 Heard.

2.

In view of the return filed by the State of Chhattisgarh, the respondents have admitted the fact that NOC was in fact issued by the State of Madhya Pradesh way back on 03-10-2001. In para 6 of the return, it has been stated that as the similar issue as involved in the instant petition has already been dealt with by the Hon'ble Court in the aforesaid writ petition and the petitioner has been allowed to work in the State of Chhattisgarh and therefore, the instant petition may kindly be disposed off in the interest of justice.

3.

In view of above, it is clear that the respondents have admitted that NOC was issued in favour of the petitioner, impugned order cannot be sustained and the same is hereby set aside. No further order is required to be passed. It has been stated that the petitioner is continuing in the State of Chhattisgarh. 4.

Accordingly, this petition is finally disposed off. SD/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tumane