Smt. Kiran Tripathi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4321 of 2016 Smt. Kiran Tripathi W/o Shri Krishn Kumar Tripathi Aged About 43 Years Occupation, Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Balak Kumar Aashram Gariyaband Sankul Gariyaband R/o Gram Gariyaband Block & Thana Gariyaband Revenue & Civil District Gariyaband (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat, Gramin Vikash Vibhag, Mantralay Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Secretary, Nagriya Prashashan Vibhag Mantralay Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Sanchalak, Panchayat Sanchalnalay Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

4. Mukhya Nagar Palika Adhikari, Nagar Panchayat Gariyaband District Gariyaband (Chhattisgarh)

5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Gariyaband District Gariyaband (Chhattisgarh)

6. Collector, Gariyaband District Gariyaband (Chhattisgarh)

7. District Education Officer, Gariyaband District Gariyaband (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Shangharsh Pandey, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.

Order on Board 01/09/2016 Heard.

1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is working as Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) since 2005, neither he has been given Kramonnati nor he has been given Samayman Vetanman (time

bound pay scale) and therefore, he may be permitted to file representation before the competent authority for redressal of his grievance. To this, counsel for the State has no objection.

2.

Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. In the eventuality of making any representation by the petitioner highlighting his grievance, the same is expected to be decided by the authority concerned expeditiously in accordance with law.

4.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation in accordance with law.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tiwari