Smt. Yamini Singh Rathore v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4309 of 2016 Smt. Yamini Singh Rathore S/o Shri Vinod Kumar Rathore, Aged About 33 Years Occupation Assistant Teacher, Panchayat, Primary School, Tiwarta, Sankul Tiwarta, R/o Village Tiwarta, Block & Thana Deepka, Revenue & Civil District Korba, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretay, Panchayat, Gramin Vikas Vibhag, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
2. Director, Panchayat, Sanchanalaya Chhattisgarh, Indrawatibhawan, Naya Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
3. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Korba, District Korba, (Chhattisgarh)
4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Pali, District Korba, (Chhattisgarh)
5. Collector, Korba, District Korba, (Chhattisgarh)
6. District Education Officer, Korba, District Korba, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Mr. Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Shangharsh Pandey, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.
Order on Board 01/09/2016 Heard.
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is working as Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) since 2005, neither he has been given Kramonnati nor he has been given Samayman Vetanman (time bound pay scale) and therefore, he may be permitted to file representation
before the competent authority for redressal of his grievance. To this, counsel for the State has no objection.
2.
Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.
3.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. In the eventuality of making any representation by the petitioner highlighting his grievance, the same is expected to be decided by the authority concerned expeditiously in accordance with law.
4.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case and authority concerned would be at liberty to decide the representation in accordance with law.
Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tiwari