High Court Of ChhattisgarhCRMP/361/2015dissmiss for defaultnonprosecution

Subhash Agrawal And ORS. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2018-01-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 361 of 2015

1. Subhash Agrawal S/o Shri Mohanlal Agrawal Aged About 49 Years Chairman, Arss Infrastructure Projects Ltd. At Plot No. 38 Sector-A, Zone-D, Mancheswar Industrial Estate, P.S.-Mancheshwar, District Khunda, Bhubneshwwar Odisha 751010,(Odisha)

2. Rajesh Agrawal S/o Mohanlal Agrawal Aged About 40 Years Arss Infrastructure Projects Ltd. At Plot No. N-2, 88/89, I.R.C. Village, Behind Raju Bhai B.D.A. Park, Nayapalli, Bhubneshwar, District - Khurda Odisha , District : Khordha , (Odisha)

3. Anil Agrawal S/o Mohanlal Agrawal Aged About 46 Years Director Arss Infrastructure Projects Ltd. At Plot No. N-2, 88/89, I.R.C. Park, Nayapalli, Bhubneshwar, District - Khurda Odisha , District : Khordha (Odisha)

4. Sunil Agrawal S/o Mohanlal Agrawal Aged About 40 Years Director, Arss Infrastructure Projects Ltd. At Plot No. N-2, 88/89, I.R.C. Village, Behind Raju Bhai B.D.A. Park, Nayapalli, Bhubneshwar, District - Khurda Odisha , District : Khordha , (Odisha)

5. Sourab Agrawal, aged 05 years, S/o Shri Subhash Agrawal, A-7, Plot No.M1/93 R.I.C. Village, P.O./P.S. Nayapalli, Bhubneshwar (Odisha) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh , Chhattisgarh

2. Officer-In-Charge Mudahapara Police Station, P.O. Maudahapara, Raipur Chhattisgarh , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Raipur Sales Corporation Through Subhash Bathwal, Proprietor Raipur Sales Corporation, 08 Lalganga, Chamber, M.G. Road, Raipur Chhattisgarh 492001, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri K.K. Singh, Advocate For Respondents-State :

Shri Ashish Shukla, Dy. AG for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board

24/01/2018

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners pleads no instructions.

2. Since no other counsel is appearing to press this petition nor any representation is made, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the CRMP for want of prosecution.

3. Accordingly, the CRMP is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu