Umakant Tiwari v. South Eastern Coalfield Limited (Secl)

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 5677 of 2018

1. Umakant Tiwari S/o Ramayan Prasad Tiwari, Aged About 39 Years Posted And Serving As Category IV (Labourer), Churcha, (West), Churcha Colliery, District Korea, Chhattisgarh

2. Vinod Kumar Tiwari S/o Late Bhagwan Jee Tiwari, Aged About 42 Years Posted And Serving As Welder Helper - Category II, Churcha, Churcha Colliery, District Korea, Chhattisgarh

3. Narad Prasad S/o Late Brijlal, Aged About 40 Years, Posted And Serving As Support Helper- Category III, Churcha (West), Churcha Colliery, District Korea, Chhattisgarh

4. Raghunath Prasad Aditya S/o Dilchand Aditya, Aged About 41 Years Posted And Serving As Blasting Labourer, Churcha, Churcha Colliery, District Korea Chhattisgarh

5. Vansh Kumar Sahu S/o Gangaram Sahu, Aged About 40 Years, DresserCategory Ill, Churcha (West), Churcha Colliery, District Korea Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. South Eastern Coalfield Limited (SECL) Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director (C M D ) , S E C L Bhawan, Seepat Road, Bilaspur District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

2. General Manager (Personnel/NEE/PF/Pension), South Eastern Coalfield Limited (SECL) SECL Bhawan Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief General Manager, South Eastern Coalfield Limited (SECL), Baikunthpur, District Korea, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Mahendra Dubey, Advocate For Respondents :

Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 30.08.2018

1. The grievance of the petitioners is that the respondents have initiated a recruitment process for filling up the post of Security Guard and the

petitioners are eligible for the said post but the applications which the petitioners have filled up are not being forwarded by respondent no.3 to respondent no.2.

2. Given the limited grievance which the petitioners have raised, this Court does not intend to keep the petition pending rather ends of justice would serve if the writ petition is disposed of with a specific direction to respondent no.3 to ensure that if the petitioners are found eligible and suitable for participating in the recruitment for the post of Security Guard and they have made applications in this regard, the same should be forwarded to the competent authority within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. While doing so respondent no.3 shall only ascertain whether the petitioners had filed their applications before the last date of submission of application or not. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioners also to bring to the notice of the respondent no. 2 & 3 the order passed by this Court.

Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Bhola