← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6170/2019disposed off

Shri Prakash Kumar Agrawal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-08-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6170 of 2019 Shri Prakash Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Nandkishore Agrawal Aged About 43 Years R/o Village And Post Devkar, Block Saja, Police Station Saja, District - Bemetara, Occupation - Assistant Grade 2 (Udc) In Government Higher Secondary School Mohtara, Block Saja, District - Bemetara, Chhattisgarh., District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector Bemetara, District - Bemetara, Chhattisgarh., District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer Bemetara, District - Bemetara, Chhattisgarh., District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh

4. Block Education Officer Saja, District - Bemetara, Chhattisgarh., District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Suresh Kumar Verma, Advocate For State :

Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 16/08/2019 1.

The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 12.07.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Government Higher Secondary School, Mohtara Block Saja, District Bemetara to the office of Block Education Officer, Nawagarh, District Bemetara.

2.

Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on his being transferred

-2and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3.

Not opposed.

4.

Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a fresh representation to the respondents, in addition to the representation that the petitioner has already made, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved