High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6163/2019disposed off

Ramesh Kumar Koushik v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-08-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 6163 of 2019

1. Ramesh Kumar Koushik S/o Shri S.R. Koushik, Aged About 46 Years, Presently Posted As Patwari, Mohbhatta (Hlka No. 34), Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

2. Jeevraj Manhar S/o Shri Kejuram Manhar, Aged About 27 Years Presently Posted As Patwari Chandrakhuri (Halka No. 38), Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

3. Smt. Archna Lata Bande D/o Shri K.D. Bande, Aged About 29 Years Presently Posted As Patwari Anda (Halka No. 30) Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

4. Usna Baghel D/o Shri Gopaldas, Aged About 35 Years, Presently Posted As Patwari Madku (Halka No. 39), Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh

5. Rohit Kumar Koushik S/o Shri Bharkhande, Aged About 38 Years Presently Posted As Patwari Mohbhatta (Halka No. 33), Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh

6. Kala Khute D/o Shri Tularam Khute, Aged About 27 Years, Presently Posted As Patwari Sanwatpur (Halka No. 35), Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh

7. Mijajilal Kori S/o Shri B.B. Kori, Aged About 47 Years Presently Posted As Patwari Sargaon, (Halka No. 32), Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh

8. Satish Kumar Sahu S/o Shri P. L. Sahu, Aged About 28 Years Presently Posted As Patwari Marrakona (Halka No. 26), Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 10.

Om Prakash Mandavi S/o Late Shri T.R. Mandavi, Aged About 34 Years, Presently Posted As Patwari, Mundadewari (Halka No. 13),

Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 11.Parul Dhruv W/o Shri O.P. Mandavi, Aged About 34 Years, Presently Posted As Patwari Barcha (Halka No. 40), Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 12.

Vijendra Patre S/o Shri Trivhuvan Patre, Aged About 32 Years Presently Posted As Patwari, Bhareva (Halka No. 10), Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 13.

Uttam Kumar Kurre S/o Shri Asharam Kurre, Aged About 33 Years, Presently Posted As Patwari, Kukusada (Halka No. 18), Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 14.

Chandrahas Patle S/o Shri Atmaram, Aged About 31 Years Presently Posted As Patwari, Barduli (Halka No. 15), Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 15.

Narayan Prasad Banjare S/o Shri Chaitram Banjare, Aged About 28 Years Presently Posted As Patwari, Saket (Halka No. 19), Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 16.

Smt. Padma Dhruv S/o Shri P.L. Dhruv, Aged About 27 Years Presently Posted As Patwari, Sonpuri, (Halka No. 6), Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 17.

Parmeshwar Prasad Miri S/o Shri R.D. Miri, Aged About 34 Years, Presently Posted As Patwari Junwani (Halka No. 12), Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh

3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Pathariya, District, Mungeli Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Dwivedi, Advocate For State :

Mr. P. Acharya, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 16.08.2019

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure P-1 dated 25.06.2019 whereby the services of the petitioners have been transferred.

2. During the course of hearing, it was revealed that the representation in a group which the petitioners and similarly placed employees have filed is already under consideration before the respondent no.2.

3. Given the fact that the respondent no.2 is already considering the grievance of the petitioners, this Court, at this juncture, would not like to interfere with the order of transfer. Reserving the right of the petitioners to approach the respondent no.2 by way of a fresh representation in addition to what they have already made and the respondent no.2 in turn is expected to take an early decision on the said representation of the petitioners, the writ petition stands disposed of. It is expected that the respondent no.2 shall take a decision at the earliest.

4. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai