Hari Singh Rajoriya v. State Of Chhattisgarh
-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5344 of 2016 Hari Singh Rajoriya S/o. Shri. R. Rajoriya, Aged About 36 Years Rural Agriculture Extension Officer, Kuakonda, Post, Thana & District Dantewada (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Agriculture And Biotechnology Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Ministry New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
2. Dy. Director, Agriculture Department, Dantewada, District Dantewada (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate For Respondent-State :
Shri B. Gop Kumar, Dy. A.G.
S.B.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 19/10/2016 Heard on admission.
1. The petitioner has filed this petition on the grievance that though the transfer order has been issued on 29th July, 2016, he is not being relieved.
2. Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner is posted at a sensitive place in a core scheduled area and if the reliever of the petitioner has not come, relieving of the petitioner may adversely affect the administrative exigency.
3. The issue regarding implementation of transfer order, has been considered by this Court in the case of Ms. Manisha Agrawal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others, 2015(4) C.G.L.J.182, wherein relying upon several judgment of the Supreme Court, it has been held by this Court that once the employee has been transferred, it is required to be complied with unless it is modified, varied
-2or cancelled.
4. Therefore, in these circumstances, either the transfer order has to be implemented or the State has the option to cancel, vary or modify or keep in abeyance.
5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed off with the direction that if the transfer order of the petitioner is not cancelled, varied or kept in abeyance by the respondent-Transferring Authority, the petitioner would be required to be relieved towards implementation, execution of the transfer order. Sd/-/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Praveen