Smt. Vijaya Ganveer v. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6173 of 2019 Smt. Vijaya Ganveer W/o Late Shri Hemchandra Ganveer Aged About 62 Years Sevanivritta Sahayak Verg 02, Karyalaya Hasdev Kachhar Jalsansadhan Vibhag, Bilaspur, Niwasi - Geetanjali Apartment Link Road Thana - Tarbahar, Tahsil, Jila - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Samanya Prashasan Vibhag, Shashkiya Karmachari Kalyan Shakha Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhavan Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Pramukh Abhiyanta Jal Sanshadhan Vibhag, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Sachiv Chhattisgarh Shashan, Jalsansadhan Vibhag, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Sambhagiya Sanyukta Sanchalak Kosh Lekha Avm Pension Bilaspur Sambhag, Jila - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Rajendra Kumar Patel, Advocate For State :

Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 16/08/2019 1.

The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is for grant of the benefit of one annual increment while fixing pension and other retiral dues payable to the petitioner.

2.

According to the petitioner, she retired from service on 30th of June, 2019. Since she has retired from service w.e.f. 30.06.2019, she would be entitled for the annual increment that would be payable to her for the period between 1 st of June, 2018 to 30th of June, 2019 as the date of annual increment payable to the petitioner is 1st of July. Therefore, according to the counsel for the petitioner, while quantifying pension and other retiral dues, the annual increment which

-2the petitioner became entitled for having worked till 30th June, 2019 has to be added to the last pay and other allowances also. 3.

Given the said facts and circumstances of the case, let the respondents 1 to 3 consider the case of the petitioner for grant of one annual increment to the last salary which the petitioner has received for the purpose of quantifying pension and other retiral dues. While deciding the claim of the petitioner, the respondents shall take into consideration the judgment of the Division Bench of Madras High Court in the case of P. Ayyamperumal vs. The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal and others decided on 15.09.2017 in W. P. No. 15732 of 2017.

4.

With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved