Chandra Kumar Dansena v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5582 of 2016 • Chandra Kumar Dansena S/o Shri Badrika Prasad Dansena, Aged About 28 Years Occupation Service, Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher Panchayat At Govt. Primary School Nalapara, Block Manora, P.S. Manora, Civil & Revenue Distt. Jashpur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Collector, Jashpur, District Jashpur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Block Education Officer, Manora, Distt. Jashpur, (Chhattisgarh)

4. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Manora, Distt. Jashpur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, GA S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 07/10/2016 Heard.

2.

The present petition has been preferred against the order dated 26-08-2016 (Annexure P-1), whereby services of the petitioner has been transferred through the attachment order passed by the Block Education Officer, Manora District Jashpur from Government primary School Nalapara to Government Primary School Baladarpath. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been transferred to a place, which is 55 KM away from the present place of posting. It is alleged that by way of attachment order, services of the petitioner has been transferred to new place of posting. He further submits that the petitioner has been transferred in

spite of the fact that the representation of the petitioner is pending before the authority taking into consideration the fact that the wife of the petitioner, who is also a government servant, and the petitioner made a request for his posting to a place nearer to his wife's posting.

4.

Upon perusal of the impugned order, it clearly reflects from the first line itself that the impugned order was issued on the ground of death of Head Master, Primary School Baladarpath, which compel the respondent authority for issuance of the said order. This Court does not find any good reason to interfere with the impugned order which has been passed in peculiar facts of the case. In case, if the petitioner intends to seek posting at the present place of posting permanently, he would be at liberty to prefer a representation before the competent authority apprising them of the same and who in turn, may consider the same.

5.

With the aforesaid observation, this petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Tumane