High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5143/2020disposed off

Rajkamal Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-01-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy1 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 5143 of 2020

1. Rajkamal Patel S/o- Tarakram Patel, Aged About 52 Years R/o- Village Gejamuda, Tahsil And District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh), Posted As Lecturer (L.B.), Government Higher Secondary School Botalda Block Kharsiya, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh).

2. Shama Parveen Khan D/o- Salim Khan Aged About 51 Years R/oDarogapara, Sattigudi Chowk Raigarh Tahsil And District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) Posted As Lecturer (L.B.), Government Higher Secondary School Sarwani Block Kharsiya, Distric Raigarh (Chhattisgarh). ---Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

2. Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

3. District Education Officer Raigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh).

4. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Raigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh), District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer Kharsiya, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh). ---Respondents For Petitioners :

Ms. Diksha Gouraha, Advocate.

For State :

Ms. Akanksha Jain, Dy. Govt. Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 18.01.2021 .

1. The limited grievance of the petitioners is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.

2. Given the limited grievance raised, let both the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to respondents 3 & 4 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.

3. With the aforesaid observation, writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder