← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6196/2019disposed off

Dinesh Kumar Baghel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-08-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.6196 OF 2019 Dinesh Kumar Baghel S/o Late Shri Ramlal Baghel Aged About 44 Years Profession Driver, R/o Ganganagar Ward No. 12, Geedam Road, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh.

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Forest, Ministry, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Conservator of Forest Jagdalpur Circle, Jagdalpur, Bastar, Chhattisgarh.

4. Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Sukma, District Sukma, Chhattisgarh.

... Respondent(s) For Petitioner :

Shri Alok Dewangan, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Shri Jitendra Pali, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 19.08.2019 1.

After arguing for sometime, the limited relief that the petitioner has sought for is for an appropriate direction to the respondents No.3&4 to ensure that whatever dues that were withheld by the authorities before issuance of Annexure P/1, dated 23.06.2015, be released to the petitioner, who is the legal heir of the deceased employee-Ram Lal Baghel. 2.

The prayer made by the petitioner is not opposed by the respondents, however, he submits that it needs verification of facts from the records. 3.

In view of the aforesaid submissions, this court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to approach the respondents No.3&4 by making a detailed representation within a period of 15 days from today so far as the amount which has been withheld by the department and the respondents No.3&4, in turn, are directed to consider the same particularly verify the fact whether the amounts which were withheld or recovered from the

deceased employee namely Ram Lal Baghel has been released back to the petitioner or not. If not, the petitioner be paid the same subject to verification of the facts and also verifying whether the petitioner is infact the legal heir of the deceased or not.

4.

Let this exercise be concluded within a further period of four months from the date of receipt of representation.

5.

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder