Ku. Leena Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.5713 OF 2018 Ku. Leena Yadav D/o D/o Laxminarayan Yadav Aged About 26 Years R/o Ward No. 8, Old Chandaniyapara, Shiv Mandi Gali, Janjgir District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh.

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Energy Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, (An Enterprises Of Government Of Chhattisgarh), Through Its Managing Director, Dagania, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Deputy General Manager Chhattisgarh State Electricity Holding Company Limited, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Chief Engineer Chhattisgarh State Electricity Production Company Limited, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

5. The Collector District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh.

6. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh.

... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) :

Shri Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Ms. Astha Shukla, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 31.08.2018 1.

Challenge in this petition is to non granting of employment in lieu of land belonging to the family of the petitioner which was acquired by the respondents.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has made representation in this regard to the higher authorities in the department but till date the same has not been decided. He submits that the petitioner may be permitted to move fresh representation to the respondent No.2 and in turn he may be directed to decide the same within a stipulated period in accordance with the policy framed in this regard by the respondents. 3.

The prayer is not opposed by the respondents.

4.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed. In addition to the representation which the petitioner has already made, he is at liberty to make a fresh representation before the respondent No.2 within a period of 30 days from today in respect of her claim supported with all relevant documents and on submission of said representation, the respondent No.2 in turn shall decide the same within an outer limit of 90 days thereafter. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy Judge inder