Imran Ansari v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C. No. 5565 of 2019 • Imran Ansari S/o Shri Kurban Ansari Aged About 30 Years R/o Sanjay Nagar, Behind Mishra Hotel, Ring Road No. 1, P. S. Tikrapara, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
----Applicant
Versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Gole Bazar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent For Applicant :
Mr. K.K. Dewangan, Advocate.
For Respondent :
Mr. Sameer Sharma, Dy. G.A.
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 18/11/2019 • The accused/applicant has moved this first bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for releasing him on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No. 225/2012 registered at Police Station - Gol Bazar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 325, 324, 326, 294, 506 of IPC and Section 25 & 27 of Arms Act.
• The prosecution story in brief is that, the complainant has lodged a report before the police Station Gole Bazar, alleging therein that, the present applicant along with other coaccused persons hurled abuses in a meeting held at Nayapara Mosque and assaulted the complainant by threatening to commit murder. After the lapse of 7 years of incident, police has arrested the present applicant and registered the offence against him.
• Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present
case. He further submits that the co-accused namely Mohammad Aarif has already been granted bail on 06.09.2019 in MCRC No. 5085/2019 by this Court. He is ready to abide by all the conditions imposed for grant of bail. Therefore, it is prayed that the Applicant may be granted bail. • On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application.
• I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.
• Taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence, facts and circumstances of the case, further considering the fact that the co-accused has already been granted bail and the trial is likely to take some time for its final disposal, this Court is of the view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the application is allowed.
• Accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear before the said Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court.
Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge Vijay Sahu