Radhakrishna Gupta v. Union Of India

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2458 of 2018 • Radhakrishna Gupta S/o Late Shankardayal Prasad Aged About 50 Years Transporter/ Bus Operator, R/o Near Rani Talab, Near Old Bus Stand, Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Urban Development Government Of India, New Delhi - 110001

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Joint Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh Naya Mantralaya, Naya Raipur - 492002

3. The Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department Naya Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh. 492002

4. The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Of Surguja, Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh

5. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority Surguja (Ambikapur) District Surguja Chhattisgarh

6. The Secretary, Surguja Urban Public Transport Society, Collectorate Premises , E - Sewa Centre, Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent For Petitioner Ms. Sareena Khan, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Anshul R. Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent/State Mr. Shashank Thakur, Govt. Advocate Order On Board By Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra 9/10/2018

1. Heard.

2. In view of the complications arising out of the defects in the amendment application itself, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to prefer a fresh writ petition challenging vires of the subject Notifications.

3. Permission granted.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed, as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge Shyna