Samasth Ward Wasi Of Nagar Panchayat Kirodimal Nagar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPPIL No. 73 of 2018 • Samasth Ward Wasi of Nagar Panchayat Kirodimal Nagar District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, Represented By Sunita Vishwakarma, W/o Mohan Lal Vishwakarma, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Ward No. 8, Nanhu Nagar, Kirodimal Nagar, Post- Kirodimal Nagar, P. S. Kotra Road Raigarh, Tehsil and District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management Mantrlalaya, Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Revenue And Civil District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Commissioner Bilaspur, Division, Revenue And Civil District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3. District Collector Raigarh, Revenue And Civil District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

4. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Raigarh, Tehsil Raigarh, Revenue And Civil District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

5. The Tehsildar Tehsil Raigarh, Revenue And Civil District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

6. Municipal Council Kirodimal Nagar Through Chief Municipal Officer District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

7. General Manager District Industries And Trade Centre Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

8. M/s. Jindal Steel And Power Limited Patrapali, Kharsiya Road, Riagarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents __________________________________________________________________ For Petitioner :

Shri Surfaraj Khan, Advocate For Respondents-State :

Shri Y.S. Thakur, Additional Advocate General For Respondent-Council :

Shri Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board Per, Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice 18.09.2018 1.

The issue raised by the residents of Nagar Panchayat, Kirodimal Nagar, Tehsil and District - Raigarh will be brought to the notice of the District Collector, Raigarh, who will examine the authenticity of the grievance so raised and whatever measure is required to be done, will be done within a

reasonable time frame. The Collector will take into consideration the obligation which has been taken upon by the State in matter of such acquisition of land and suitable compensation in terms of similar facilities which are required to be provided. 2.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge Chandra