← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/4468/2021dismissed

M/S Ayush Agrawal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-11-29Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 4468 of 2021 M/s Ayush Agrawal Aged About 22 Years Through Its Proprietor, Ayush Agrawal, S/o Pawan Kumar Agrawal, R/o New Sarkanda, Tehsil And DistrictBilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2.

The Engineer-In-Chief Public Helath Engineering Department, Nirman Bhawan, North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3.

Executive Engineer/ Member Secretary, District Water And Sanitation Mission ( Dwsm), Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None For Respondents/State : Mr. Vikram Sharma, Deputy Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Judge Order on Board Per Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice 29.11.2021 When the matter was called up at the first instance, Mr. Aditya Agrawal, learned counsel submitted that he has been instructed by the counsel on record not to press this petition.

2.

Since Mr. Aditya Agrawal had not signed the Vakalatnama, we requested Mr. Aditya Agrawal to inform the counsel on record, namely, Mr. Rohit Sharma, Mr. Vinod Kumar Pandey and Mr. Amit Soni to make such submission.

3.

On the second round, which is after recess, neither Mr. Aditya Agrawal nor the learned counsel on record has appeared. 4.

In that view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Arup Kumar Goswami) (N. K. Chandravanshi) Chief Justice Judge Anu