Vimal Jain v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPCR No. 522 of 2018

1. Vimal Jain S/o Late Maniklal Jain Aged About 66 Years R/o Chobey Colony, Sarswati Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Vaibhav Jain S/o Shri Vimalchand Jain Aged About 40 Years R/o Chobey Colony, Sarswati Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Home/police, Mahanandi, Mantralaya, Police Station And Post Rakhi, New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Superintendent Of Police District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Station House Officer Police Station Amanaka, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Jasbir Singh Bagga S/o Late Kishan Lal Bagga Aged About 45 Years R/o Station Road, Infront Of Uttam Cycle Stores Mahasamund District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh

5. Union Bank Of India Through Branch Manager, Near Lic Office, Jhabak Plaza, Raipur Road, Mahasamund District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh, District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Smt. Fouzia Mirza, Advocate For State :

Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer S.B. : Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 12/09/2018 Heard.

1. Though number of grounds have been urged to assail the action of the

-2respondent- police authority in registering FIR against the petitioners, taking into consideration that earlier the respondent No.4/complainant had filed writ petition in which direction was issued by this Court for registration of FIR, no relief can be granted in this petition because the registration of FIR is pursuant to direction issued by this Court on 30th July 2018 in WPCR No.397 of 2018.

2. The petition is therefore dismissed.

Sd/-/---/-/--- -- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Praveen