Amit Agrawal v. Bhola Prasad Dewangan, Since Deceased Through Lrs

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3261 of 2018

1. Amit Agrawal S/o Shri Radheshyam Agrawal Aged About 40 Years R/o Rathore Chowk, Ramsagar Para, Raipur, Tahsil And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Bhola Prasad Dewangan, Since Deceased and represented through LRs namely;

(i) Shailendra Dewangan (ii) Khemchand Dewangan Both are sons of Late Shri Bhola Prasad Dewangan R/o Old Mangal Bazar, Gudhiyari, Raipur, Tahsil And DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Tahsildar Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Collector Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

5. The Commissioner Raipur Division, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

6. The Board Of Revenue Circuit Court-Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Through Its Registrar.

---- Respondent For Petitioner Shri Pallav Mishra, Advocate For Respondent/State Shri Rajesh Singh, Dy. Govt. Adv.

Order On Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.

09/01/2019

1. Dispute agitated in this petition pertains to the validity of the demarcation carried out by the Revenue Authorities. According to the petitioner, the demarcation was not carried in accordance with law.

2. Admittedly, a suit for recovery of possession has already been preferred the respondent No.1 before the jurisdictional civil Court at Raipur. Since civil suit pertaining to the same land is pending consideration, the matter in issue can be agitated by the petitioner before the Civil Court.

3. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Gowri