Ram Narayan Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 5254 of 2020
2. Ram Narayan Sahu S/o Shri Budharu Ram Sahu Aged About 37 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Government Primary School Mouri Khurd, Block Kurud , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.
2. Smt. Sarawati Sau W/o Shri Santwan Sahu Aged About 38 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Government Primary School Charmudiya , Block Kurud , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.
3. Rupendra Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Bishnu Ram Sahu Aged About 43 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Government Naveen Primary School Bhathpara, Joratarai (A) , Block Kurud , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.
4. Vimal Prakash Patel S/o Shri Ram Kumar Patel Aged About 37 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Government Girls Primary School Koshmarra, Block Kurud , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.
5. Smt. Jani Sahu W/o Shri Rupendra Kumar Sahu Aged About 37 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Government Primary School Khukuha, Block Kurud , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.
6. Khilawan Ram Sahu S/o Shri Kamta Ram Sahu Aged About 36 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Government Naveen Girls Primary School Pachpedi, Block Kurud , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.
7. Smt. Leena Bharti Sinha W/o Shri Lakhan Singh Sinha Aged About 37 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Government Middle School Gatapar, Block Kurud , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.
8. Ku. Savita Jyoti D/o Shri Heera Lal Jyoti Aged About 42 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Government Higher Secondary School Gatapar, Block Kurud , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.
9. Mesh Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Yan Ram Sahu Aged About 34 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Government Middle School Silghat , Block Kurud , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., 10.
Toran Singh Sahu S/o Shri Ratan Lal Sahu Aged About 40 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Government Middle School Nawagaon Kandel, Block Dhamteri , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. 11.
Ramesh Kumar Verma S/o Late Shri Sant Ram Verma Aged About 40 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) And Posted At Government
High School Bhandera, Block Doundi Lohara, District Balod Chhattisgarh.
12.
Than Singh Sahu S/o Shri Prabhu Ram Sahu Aged About 46 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) And Posted At Government High School Bhandera, Block Doundi , District Balod Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development , Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. Director Panchayat Department , Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
3. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.
4. Chief Execuctive Officer Zila Panchayat Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh.
5. Block Education Officer Block Kurud , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.
6. Block Education Officer Block Doundilohara , District Balod Chhattisgarh.
7. Block Education Officer Dhamtari District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For State :
Mr. Amit Buxy, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 15.01.2021
1. The limited grievance which the petitioners have raised in the present writ petition by virtue of the order passed by this Court in the case of Mukesh Kumar Patel Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, WPS No. 2530/2017 decided on 26.11.2017, the petitioners have been granted benefit of revised pay scale on completion of 8 years of service.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance which now remains is that the benefit is being provided to the petitioners prospectively and though the respondents have made a calculation which the petitioners are entitled from the date of their completion of 8 years of service but no effective orders have been passed nor the department has taken any steps for release of the arrears of payment. The petitioners pray for appropriate direction to the respondents for releasing the said amount.
3. Without entering into the merits of the case and taking into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Mukesh Patel (Supra) which has also been affirmed by the Division Bench and taking note of the fact that the respondents have complied with the order to the extent of granting revised pay scale to the petitioners, let respondents No. 3 to 7 take an appropriate decision at the earliest so far as release of the arrears of payment which the petitioners are entitled for. Expecting a decision from the respondents within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
4. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Jyotijha