← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/4897/2015rejected

Mahendra Kumar Sidar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-09-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C.No.3696 of 2015

1. Prakash Kahra, son of Latel Kahra, aged about 23 years, Caste-Kahra,

2. Mahendra Kumar, son of Panchram, aged about 27 years, Caste-Yadav Both Resident of Village-Malkharoda, Tahsil and Police Station-Malkharoda, Revenue and Civil District Janjgir Champa (CG) ---Applicants

Versus

State of C.G. through Police Station Malkhroda, District Janjgir Champa (CG) ---Non-applicant And M.Cr.C.No.4897 of 2015 Mahendra Kumar Sidar, aged 22 years, Caste-Sidar, S/o Satrughan Singh Sidar, R/o Village-Maalkharouda, P.S. Maalkharouda, District Janjgir-Champa (CG) ---Applicant

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh Through - P.S. Maalkharouda, District Janjgir-Champa (CG) ---Non-applicant For Applicants : Mr.Yogeshwar Sharma, Advocate in M.Cr.C.No.3696/2015 For Applicant : Mr.Ishwar Jaiswal, Advocate in M.Cr.C.No.4897/2015 For Non-applicant : Mr. Neeraj Jain, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 16/09/2015 1.

Since the aforesaid two bail applications are arising out of the same crime number, they are being disposed of by this common order. 2.

These are second bail applications under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the applicants, who have been arrested in connection with Crime No.126 of 2014, registered at Police Station-Malkharouda, District-Janjgir-

Champa (CG), for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 120B and 201/34 of the IPC.

3.

After hearing learned counsel appearing for the parties and taking into consideration the facts & circumstances of the case and nature & gravity of the offence, also considering the fact that the trial is on advanced stage and eighteen prosecution witnesses have already been examined, I do not find any ground to entertain these first bail application and second bail application. Consequently, both the applications are rejected. However, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4.

Certified copy as per rule.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE B/-