← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5854/2018disposed off

Avinash Kumar Verma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-09-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy1 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.5854 OF 2018 Avinash Kumar Verma S/o Shri Kamal Singh Aged About 28 Years R/o Ward No. 4, Rajeev Nagar, Near Sumangal Bhawan, Indira Colony, Balodabazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The Deputy Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. The Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Balodabazar, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

... Respondent(s) For Petitioner :

Shri Rahul Birthray, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Shri RN Pusty, Govt. Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 13.09.2018 1.

The grievance of the petitioner is that he has participated in the recruitment process for filling up of the post of Lecturer (Panchayat) at Zila Panchayat, Baloda Bazar. The petitioner's name appears in the waiting list and that the persons ahead of the petitioner in the wait list have been considered for appointment. There are still vacancy available from the said recruitment process on account of selected candidates not joining the post, and therefore, the petitioner may also be considered for appointment. The petitioner in this regard has made a representation before the respondent authorities but the same has not been decided till date. 2.

Given the limited contentions of the petitioner, this court does not intend to keep this petition pending any further. Rather ends of justice would serve if the respondents No.2&3 are directed to take a decision on the representation which the petitioner has made. It is ordered accordingly. 3.

In addition to the earlier representation, the petitioner is also at liberty to move fresh representation to either of the respondents. On such representation being made, the respondents shall take a decision within an outer limit of 60 days from the date of representation. 4.

With the aforesaid direction, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy Judge inder