Smt. Javita Mandavi v. State Of Chhattisgarh
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3137 of 2020 Smt. Javita Mandavi D/o Rameshwar Singh Mandavi (S.T.), Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Bhanpuri (Farsaguda), Tahsil And District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Revenue/Disaster Management Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)
2. Collector, Jagdalpur District - Bastar (Chhattisgarh)
3. Tahsildar, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar (Chhattisgarh)
4. Sub Divisional Officer P.W.D. (B And R), Sub Division No. 1, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent For petitioner - Shri T.K. Jha, Advocate.
For Respondent/State - Shri Gagan Tiwari, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 17/12/2020 Heard.
1.
Challenge in this petition is to the Annexure P-1 dated 17/11/2020. 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was Chairman of Zila Panchayat, Jagdalpur in between the period from 2015 to 2019. At that time she was alloted a quarter E-4 at Lal Bagh, Jagdalpur. After she has demitted the office a notice Annexure P-1 has been served on 17/11/2020 whereby it is stated that the illegal construction which is made on E-4 this requires to be demolished. Learned counsel submits that in the guise of this notice the respondents would demolish the construction of his father which is out side E-4. 3.
I failed to understand what is the cause of action to file this petition if the petitioner has already vacated the house E-4 then the notice for demolition dated 17/11/2020 would not affect her as she has stated that
she is not in possession, therefore no cause of action arises to entertain this petition.
4.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) JUDGE gouri