Kuber Sinha v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 5216 of 2020
1. Kuber Sinha S/o Shri Mandas Sinha Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Jondhra, Post Gidarri, Tahsil Chhuria, P.S. Dongargaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home / Police Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Police Station And Post Rakhi, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. Director General Of Police (D.G.P.) Police Headquarters (PHQ), Near Mahanadi Bhawan, Police Station And Post Rakhi, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
3. Additional Director General Of Police (A.D.G.P.) Chhattisgarh Armed Force (CAF), Police Headquarters (PHQ), Near Mahanadi Mantralay, Police Station And Post Rakhi, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
4. Superintendent Of Police (S.P.) STF Baghera, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh.
5. Dilip Vashnik Platoon Commander, STF Baghera, District Durg Chhattisgarh.
6. Manish Sharma Assistant Sub Inspector, STF Baghera, District Durg Chhattisgarh.
7. Mannaram Head Constable, STF Baghera, District Durg Chhattisgarh.
8. Bahadur Singh Maravi Head Constable, STF Baghera, District Durg Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate.
For State : Shri Sudeep Verma, Dy. G.A.i Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 14.12.2020
1. The limited grievance that the petitioner has raised, is the out of turn promotion granted to the respondents No. 5 to 8 for having successfully participated in a naxal operation in August 2018. According to the petitioner, he was also part of the same team and had also accompanied the respondents No. 5 to 8, however the
petitioner's claim for out of turn promotion has not been considered nor has the respondents held that the petitioner is not eligible for the said promotion.
2. Given the fact that the respondents have till date not taken a decision in respect of out of turn promotion of the petitioner at par with the respondents No. 5 to 8, ends of justice would meet if the writ petition at this juncture is disposed of directing the petitioner to approach the respondents No. 2 to 4 within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order and the respondents No. 2 to 4 inturn shall consider/decide the representation of the petitioner at the earliest in accordance with law and shall also consider the claim of the petitioner on the ground of parity with the respondents No. 5 to 8, if at all if things are identical, preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of representation to be made by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
3. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha