← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/887/2019allowed

Managing Director v. Jitendra Kumar Vishwakarma

2019-09-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 887 of 2019

1. Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Office Complex, Sector 24, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. District Manager Chhattisgarh District Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Sukma, District Sukma, Chhattisgarh.

3. General Manager (Transportation) Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Block No.07A, Second Floor, Office Complex, Sector 24, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Applicants

Versus

1. Jitendra Kumar Vishwakarma S/o Late Channu Lal Vishwakarma Aged About 31 Years R/o Geedam Naka, Rajendra Nagar Ward, Narayanpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh. Through Power Of Attorney Holder Jaydeep Singh Bhadauriya, S/o Shri Dheeraj Singh Bhadauriya, Aged About 40 Years, Village And Post Tengapal, Tahsil Chhindagadh, District Sukma, Chhattisgarh.

2. Krishna Raj Singh S/o Late Lallu Singh Aged About 73 Years R/o Village And Post Dantewada, G.A.D. Colony, Dantewada, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh

3. District Transport Officer South Bastar, Dantewada Chhattisgarh

4. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection, Indrawati Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Post Office Rakhi, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Applicants :

Shri V.R. Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Shri Avinash Singh, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 27/09/2019

1. Heard.

2. The present MCC is filed for the modification of the order dated 18.07.2019

passed in WPC No.2347 of 2019.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that on 18.07.2019 when the order was passed in WPC No.2347 of 2019, he was present before the Court and he has argued the matter on behalf of respondents No.2 to 4 but inadvertently his name has not appeared in the said order. Therefore, he prays that his name may be mentioned in the order dated 18.07.2019 in WPC No.2347 of 2019 on behalf of respondents No.2 to 4.

4. Learned State counsel has not opposed the same.

5. In view of the above, it is directed that the name of Shri V.R. Tiwari, Advocate be mentioned in the order dated 18.07.2019 passed in WPC No.2347 of 2019 on behalf of respondents No.2 to 4.

6. With the aforesaid observation, the MCC stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu