High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6483/2019disposed off

Nehar Singh Nagesh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-08-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6483 of 2019 Nehar Singh Nagesh S/o Shri Ghasiram Nagesh, Aged About 34 Years, Posted As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), At Government Primary School Kanwaraama, R/o Village Jadapadar, Tahsil Mainpur DistrictGariyaband, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector Gariyaband, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer Gariyaband, District- Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Gariyaband, DistrictGariyaband, Chhattisgarh

5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Mainpur, DistrictGariyaband, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Ghanshyam Kashyap, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ayaz Naved, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 27/08/2019

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the enquiry report submitted by the respondents (Annexure P-1).

2. At the outset, this Court is of the opinion that in the light of the WPS 1909/2017 decided on 24.04.2017 along with other connected matters, the present writ petition may not be sustainable as this court

on earlier round of litigation had granted the petitioner liberty to approach this Court in the event of an adverse order being passed. There was also interim protection given to the petitioner for a period of one month from the date order would be passed.

3. Given the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is reluctant to entertain the present writ petition as of now. The petitioner would be at liberty to submit his reply to the enquiry report and also make submission to the authorities concerned who in turn shall take into consideration the contentions which petitioner raises in his defence both before the enquiry as well as in the written submission that he would be submitting to the concerned authority.

4. Authorities concerned in turn also expected to take into consideration all these contentions before passing a final order.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Khatai