High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6373/2019disposed off

Smt. Purnima Shrivastava v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 6373 of 2019 Smt. Purnima Shrivastava W/o Shri C. K. Shrivastava, Aged About 62 Years, Retired State Officer, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, R/o House No. 10, Geetanjali City Phase-1, Bilaspur, Tahsil And DistrictBilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Secretary, Urban Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Directorate Urban Administration And Development Through It Director, Urban Administration And Development, Indrawati Bhawan, Capital Complex, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Municipal Corporation, Chirmiri Through Its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chirmiri, District- Koritya, Chhattisgarh

4. Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur Through Its Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate For State :

Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 11.09.2019

1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner retired from service

w.e.f. 30th of April, 2019. Though more than 4 months have passed, till date the petitioner has not received any amount under pension and gratuity. The petitioner has even not been paid the anticipatory pension.

2. If the contention of the petitioner has to be accepted, the petitioner has not been paid even a single penny after his retirement.

3. Given the said grievance of the petitioner, let the respondents consider the grievance of the petitioner and ensure that the retiral dues payable to the petitioner is finalized at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from today. If the petitioner is not paid the entire admissible retiral dues within 60 days period, the entire retiral dues would carry interest @ 12% per annum from the date of retirement till the date of actual payment. The said amount would be recoverable from the erring officers who do not process the case of the petitioner promptly. Needless to mention that the petitioner would complete the requisite formalities for releasing of the entire retiral dues.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai