← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6422/2019disposed off

Dev Das Khelkar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-08-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6422 of 2019 Dev Das Khelkar S/o Late Sonau Ram Aged About 44 Years Working As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School, Bhandarpur, Block Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh R/o Village Devkatta, Police Station Dongargarh, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indravati Bhawan, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Collector Rajnandgaon, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

4. District Education Officer Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer Khairagarh, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate For State :

Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 26/08/2019

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 12.07.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Bhandarpur, Khairagarh to Tolagaon, Khairagarh.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a

representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on his being transferred and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3. Not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit