← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/4218/2021disposed off

Ghanshyam Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-10-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant2 pages

WPC No. 4218 of 2021 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 4218 of 2021 • Ghanshyam Sahu S/o Shri Arjun Sahu Aged About 56 Years R/o Bazar Para, Atal Chowk, Gram Panchayat Korra, Block Kurud, Tahsil Bakhara, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector Dhamtari District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

3. The Sub Divisional Officer Kurud District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

4. The Tahsildar Bakhara District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

5. Gram Panchayat Korra Through Its Secretary, At Post Office Of Gram Panchayat Korra, Block Kurud District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :- Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate For Respondent-State :- Mr. Ashish Tiwari, G.A.

SB.: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order On Board 22/10/2021

1. Heard.

2. It is submitted that petitioner is in possession of a land regarding which he has made a representation before the

WPC No. 4218 of 2021 SDO (Revenue), Kurud praying for grant of lease under the scheme of Rajiv Gandhi Ashrayay Awas Yojna, 2019.

3. It is submitted by the petitioner that he is in possession of the land since about 30 years. The similar representation has been made by the petitioner before Tahsildar, Tahsil Bhakhara District Dhamtari which is also pending without decision. Another representation was filed by the petitioner making the same prayer before the Collector, District Dhamtari. It is submitted that a specific direction be issued to the respondent Authorities to decide the representations filed within a time frame.

4. Learned State counsel appearing for the respondent prays for passing an appropriate order.

5. After considering the submissions made, the writ petition is disposed off at motion stage. However, the respondents No.2 and 4 are directed to consider the representations filed by the petitioner within a time frame preferably within a period of three months from today.

6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed off. SD/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge Ayushi