High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPCR/524/2018dismissed

Dhaneshwar Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-07-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPCR No. 524 of 2018 • Dhaneshwar Patel S/o Premlal Patel Aged About 29 Years President Of Prathmik Krishi Co-Operative Society Sarkanda, Pithora, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. R/o Village - Jamhar, Post Bhithidih, Pithora District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Home Department Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Capital Complex Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Inspector General Of Police , Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Superintendent Of Police, Mahasamund District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

4. Sub - Divisional Officer ( Police ) Pithora, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

5. Station Houe Officer, Police Station - Pithora, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

6. Ramdulari Sinha W/o Shri Sitaram Sinha Aged About 50 Years President Of Prathmik Krishi Co-Operative Society, Ltd. Sarkada Tahsil Pithora, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. R/o Village - Sarkada, Post Office Bhithidih, Tahsil - Pithora District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

7. Sitaram Sinha S/o Paras Ram Aged About 54 Years Member Of Prathmik Krishi Co - Operative Society, Ltd. Sarkada, Tahsil Pithora District Mahasamund. R/o Village - Sarkada, Post Office Bhithidih, Tahsil - Pithora District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

8. Khileshwar Sinha Junior Clerk - Cum - Cashior, District CoOperative Central Bank Ltd. Pithora, Tahsil Pithora, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

9. Madanlal Mandloi S/o Manrakhan Mandloi, Supervisor At District Co - Operative Central Bank Ltd. Pithora Branch Tumgaon, Tahsil Pithora District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

10. Noksingh Thakur R/o Village - Birjapali, Ganjar, Tendukona, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, Advocate For State : Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel Lawyer

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 01.07.2021

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that with the efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.

2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge kishore