← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6471/2019disposed off

Surendra Jhalariya v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-08-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice Dilip Raosaheb Deshmukh2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO. 6471 OF 2019 Surendra Jhalariya S/o Late Manharan Lal Jhalariya Aged About 40 Years R/o Ramkrishan Enclave Near Ameri Gate, Shantinagar, Bilaspur, DistrictBilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director General Of Police Police Head Quarter, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Additional Director General Of Police Chhattisgarh Arms Forces, Police, Head Quarter, Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. The Commandant 2nd Battalian, Chhattisgarh Arms Forces, Sakti, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

5. Deputy Superintendent Of Police M.T. Workshop, Bilaspur, DistrictBilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner :

Mr. Somkant Verma, Adv.

For State :

Mr. Ayaz Naved, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 27.08.2019

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order AnnexureP/1 dated 0 3/08/2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from office of respondent No. 5 Deputy Superintendent of Police, M.T. Workshop, Bilaspur to office of respondent No. 4 Commandant, 2nd Battalian Chhattisgarh Arms Forces, Sakri, Bilaspur.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising these grounds and the

respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3. Not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents which considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible.

Sd/-/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha