Ramakant Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CRMP No. 872 of 2015

1. Ramakant Singh S/O Shri Suresh Singh Aged About 32 Years R/O Shubh Regency, Flat No. S-910, Police Station Chakarbhata, Tehsil Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

2. Smt. Basanti Devi W/O Ramakant Singh Aged About 29 Years R/O Shubh Regency, Flat No. S-910, Police Station Chakarbhata, Tehsil Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Home Affairs (Police), Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Rev. And Civil District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Director General Of Police, Bilaspur Rev. And Civil Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Inspector General Of Police Bilaspur Range, Rev. And Civil District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

4. Superintendent Of Police Bilaspur, Rev. And Civil Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

5. Station House Officer Police Station Chakarbhata, Rev. And Civil Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

6. Pappu Gupta S/O Shiv Kumar, Aged About 35 Years R/O In Front Of Shubh Regency, Chakarbhata, Tehsil - Bilha, Rev. And Civil Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

7. Santosh Kumar Jaswani S/O Dharam @ Dharmu Jaswani, Aged About 40 Years R/O Ward No. 15, In Front Of Gyanuday Vidhya Mandir School, Chakarbhata, Tehsil Bilha, Rev. And Civil Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

8. Pawan Dixit @ Daddu S/O Ashok Dixit Aged About 26 Years R/O Ambey Jeans Corner, Near Nagar Panchayat Office, Chakarbhata, Tehsil Bilha, Rev. And Civil Distt. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

9. Gulshan Jaswani S/O Suresh Jaswani Aged About 25 Years R/O Shubh Regency, Flat No. S-14, Chakarbhata, Tehsil Bilha, Rev. And Civil District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents 29/09/2015 Shri Surfaraj Khan, counsel for the petitioners. Ms. M. Asha, PL for the State.

Heard.

Perusal of the case would show that on a certain report which was made on 31/08/2015 the Police has registered the case

under Section 294, 506 B, 323, 456/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioners would submit that the dacoity was also committed and evidence is not being recorded and there was an effort of the accused to kill the petitioners and also outraged the modesty of the petitioner No. 2, therefore, the Police may be directed to register the case under the charging section as alleged.

Perusal of the case file would show that the report was made on 31/08/2015 and it seems the matter is being investigated. It is expected that the State authorities / the Police shall record the statement of the witnesses and the victim, as it is narrated without making any intervention of their own and if the petitioners are still aggrieved, they shall have the remedy to file the necessary complaint, if so advised. Hence this petition is premature.

With such observation, the Cr.M.P. stands disposed of. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Kamde