High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6654/2019disposed off

Manish Jangde v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6654 of 2019 Manish Jangde S/o Shri Chowaram Jangde Aged About 38 Years Posted As Sub Engineer Balod, R/o Kundrupara, Aam Bagicha, Ward No. 15, Balod, Tehsil And District Balod, Chhattisgarh, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Under Secretary, Department Of Public Works, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Engineer-In-Chief, Department Of Public Works, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Superintendent Engineer, Department Of Public Works, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Sub-Divisional Officer, Department Of Public Works, Gariyaband, District Gariaband Chhattisgarh, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

5. Sub-Divisional Officer, Department Of Public Works, Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Akhilesh Mishra, Advocate For State :

Ms. Abhyunnati Singh, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 02/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 16.08.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from the Department of Public Works, Division Balod, District Balod to the Department of Public Works, North Bastar, Division No.1, Jagdalpur, District Jagdalpur.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and

grievances on his being transferred and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3. Not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved