High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/4335/2021disposed off

Arjun v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-10-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(C.) No.4335 of 2021

1. Arjun S/o Ramsingh Nishad Aged About 75 Years

2. Kaushalya W/o Dhanshyam Patel Aged About 66 Years

3. Leelamber S/o Brajlal Aged About 67 Years

4. Chandrika D/o Piritram Aged About 66 Years

5. Bhadul S/o Fatteram Aged About 74 Years

6. Nirakar Patel W/o Brajbihari Patel Aged About 36 Years (All are resident Of Village Bhaisamuhan, Tehsil Dabhra, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Water Resource, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Collector Janjgir Champa District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

4. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Dabhra District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner - Mr. T.K. Jha, Advocate.

For State - Mr. Rahul Jha, Govt. Advocate.

S.B.- Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order on Board 29-10-2021

1. Heard on this petition.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are the land owners whose landed property was

-2acquisitioned by the respondents. The compensation for the same has also been determined by respondent No.4 in the land acquisition case. The petitioners have some grievance regarding the order of compensation passed by respondent No.4, therefore, they have filed a representation praying to amend the award, before the respondent No.4 but the application is still pending without any progress. Therefore, direction may be issued to respondent No.4 to consider on that application and dispose it off.

3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions and submits that appropriate order may be passed.

4. After considering on the submissions, the petition is disposed off. Respondent No.3 and 4 are directed to consider on the representation filed by the petitioners and decide the same in accordance with law within a time frame of 60 days.

5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed off. Sd/- Monika (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge