High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6280/2018disposed off

Smt. Manju Tiwari v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-01-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 6280 of 2018 Smt. Manju Tiwari W/o Ravindra Tiwari, Aged About 38 Years Posted As Assistant Teacher (NN) At Government Bunyadi Primary School Bhogahapara, Block Sheorinarayan, District Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh) R/o Village Kharod, Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Urban Administration And Development Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Deputy Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Sheorinarayan District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Faisal Akhtar, Advocate For State :

Mr. Salim Kazi, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 17/01/2019

1. The challenge in these writ petition is to the order dated 30.06.2018. The relief sought for by the petitioner is for grant of Kramonnati on her completing 7 years of service with the respondents.

2. Counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the State, on due verification of the facts, submit that the issue raised by the petitioner in this petition has already been considered by this Court in a bunch of writ petitions leading of which being WPS 5358/2018 (Smt. Ankita Shrivastava

-2Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) decided on 12.12.2018 wherein this Court had directed the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners therein for grant of Kramonnati if they were otherwise entitled for the same. It is also not in dispute that in those bunch of writ petitions, the impugned order was same i.e. 30.06.2018 which was under challenge.

3. Given the fact that this Court has already passed an order in an identical issue, this Court is of the opinion that the present writ petition also deserve to be disposed of in similar terms.

4. The present writ petition accordingly stands disposed of in similar terms. The respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of Kramonnati in accordance with the rules if she is otherwise entitled for the same and fulfills the required eligibility criteria. Let this exercise be completed by the respondents within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Khatai