Smt. Vimla Bai Dewangan @ Urkha Bai v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Page No.1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.CR.C. No. 4211 of 2017 Smt. Vimla Bai Dewangan @ Urkha Bai, W/o. Ganesh Dewangan, Aged About 54 Years, R/o. Pawan Kirana Dukan Gali, House Of Shobha Bai, Sikola Bhatha, Durg, Police Station : Mohan Nagar, Durg, District-Durg Chhattisgarh ----Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh, Through : District Magistrate, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Neeraj Jain, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order On Board 25/10/2017 1.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicant, who has been arrested on 27.11.2016, in connection with Crime No.633/2017, registered at Police Station - Mohan Nagar, Durg, District - Durg (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. 2.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. As alleged that the applicant has impersonated as Ukha Bai for registration of fake sale deed, there is no evidence of prosecution to prove the charge against the applicant, hence prayed that the applicant may be

Page No.2 enlarged on bail.

3.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application and the submission made in this respect. It is submitted that the applicant is main accused of this case and she was impersonator, who was instrumental in the registration of fake sale deed, hence she is not entitled for grant of bail. 4.

I have heard the learned counsel for both the parties and perused the case diary.

5.

The applicant is local resident. Trial against her is likely to take sometime, hence for these reasons, no purpose would be served, if the, applicant is kept in detention for whole period of trial. Taking into consideration such fact, this Court is of the opinion that present is a fit case, in which, the applicant should be enlarged on regular bail.

6.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed.

7.

It is directed that applicant shall be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety each in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for her appearance as and when directed. 8.

Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge Balram