← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/5292/2020disposed off

Sanjay Kumar Dubey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-01-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 5292 of 2020 Sanjay Kumar Dubey S/o K. L. Dubey, Aged About 47 Years, Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Government Higher Secondary School, Malhar, Block Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Director, Directorate Of Urban Administration And Development, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Malhar, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

5. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

6. Block Education Officer, Masturi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate For State :

Mr. Rahul Jha, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 15.01.2021

1. The limited grievance which the petitioner has raised in this present writ petition, by virtue of order passed by this Court in the case of Mukesh Kumar Patel Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, WPS No. 2530/2017 decided on 26.11.2017, is for grant of the benefit of revised pay scale on completion of 8 years of service.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance which now remains is that the benefit is being provided to the petitioner prospectively. Though the respondents have made a calculation which the petitioner was entitled from the date of his completion of 8 years of service but no effective orders have been passed nor have the Department taken any step for releasing the arrears of payment. The petitioner prays for appropriate direction to the respondents for releasing the said amount.

3. Without entering into the merits of the case and taking into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Mukesh Patel (Supra) which has also been affirmed by the Division Bench and taking note of the fact that respondents have complied with the order to the extent of granting revised pay scale to the petitioner, let respondents No. 2 to 4 take an appropriate decision at the earliest so far as release of the arrears of payment which the petitioner is entitled for. Expecting a decision from the respondents within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai