← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCRR/611/2017dismissed

Rathram Sahu v. Smt. Nira Sahu

2017-06-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Criminal Revision No. 611 of 2017 Rathram Sahu, S/o. Kirtan Lal Sahu, Aged About 45 Years, R/o. Nehru-Nagar Balco, Police Station Balco, District- Korba, (C.G.) ---- Applicant

Versus

1. Smt. Nira Sahu, W/o. Rathram Sahu, Aged About 33 Years.

2. Ku. Ishika Sahu, D/o. Rathram Sahu, Aged About 15 Years.

3. Prajjwal Sahu, S/o. Rathram Sahu, Aged About 12 Years. (Respondent No.2 & 3 are minor through natural guardian mother, Respondent No.1).

All are resident of Gaytri Mandir Road Bhadara-para Balco, Police Station- Balco, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant : Mr. B.L.Sahu & Mr. Ravi Maheshwari, Advocates --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 23.06.2017 Heard 1.

This is a petition against the interim maintenance granted to the children vide order dated 16.05.2016 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Korba, in Case No.239 of 2016 2.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the children are residing with their mother and the expenses are being incurred by the father, as such, no further maintenance can be granted. It is further submitted that an application has already been filed for restoration of conjugal rights, therefore, the respondents are not entitled for any relief.

3.

Perusal of the order dated 16.05.2016 would show that the interim maintenance of Rs.3000/- each to the children who are minor, total Rs.6000/- granted to the wife and inter se relation between the

parties that the respondent No.2 & 3 are children have not been denied.

4.

Considering the fact that the applicant is the father, he is under a moral and pious obligation to maintain his children so that they can grow up with bright future, I do not find any illegality or perversity in the order of interim maintenance granted to the children.

5.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed at the admission stage itself. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Ashok