Ramhirde Sahu @ Hirdey v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 3226 of 2020 • Ramhirde Sahu @ Hirdey S/o Late Shri Kartik Ram Sahu Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Kirwai, Police Station Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. The Collector Gariyaband District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh
3. The Tahsildar Tahsil Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh
4. Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Kirwai Tahsil Rajim, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri S.B. Pandey, Advocate For Respondents/State :
Shri Amrito Das, Addl. AG Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 05/01/20
1. Heard.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is a land less person and he was in possession of the part of the land bearing Khasra No.874 area 0.50 Hectare at village Kirwai. He would further submit that the petitioner is in possession of the said land since 1980 and cultivating for their livelihood. Lastly he has been served with a notice on 14.08.2020 by the Gram Panchayat Kirwai whereby the petitioner has been asked to vacate the land which is in his possession. He would further submit that since the petitioner is a land less
person and his livelihood is dependant on the agriculture which is being done on the said part of the land and if the petitioner is evicted, the question of survival will come to fore. Under these circumstances, the petitioner has made a representation to the Tehsildar, Rajim, District Gariyaband (Annexure P-4) that may be directed to be decided according to the policy of the State.
3. Considering the limited prayer made and after perusal of the Annexure P-4, which is a letter addressed to the Tehsildar Rajim, the Tehsildar Rajim taking into the contents of the same shall decide the application according to the policy of the State and if the petitioner is a land less person, the Tehsildar shall be obliged to decide the claim of the petitioner as per the policy of the State.
4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/-Sd/-- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu