← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6361/2018disposed off

Rekhram v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-09-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 6361 of 2018 Rekhram S/o Dashrath Ram Patel, Aged About 30 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer (NN) At Government Higher Secondary School Kumbhari, Block Dhamdha, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh, R/o Village Daundilohara, Block Daundilohara, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner Cum-Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Kumbhari District- Durg, Chhattisgarh

4. Block Education Officer, Dhamdha, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For State :

Ms. Astha Shukla, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 27.09.2018 Ignoring the default as pointed out by the Registry, with the consent of the parties, the matter decided finally.

2.

The Petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the Respondents, whereby the increment granted to the Petitioner is being withdrawn on the ground that he has not passed B.Ed/D. Ed examination. 3.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the issue with regard

to withdrawal/non-grant of increment on the ground of having not passed B.Ed/D.Ed examination was examined by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle v. State of Chhattisgarh (WPS No.4271 of 2017 and batch of petitions vide order dated 03.11.2017) and various directions have been issued for affording proper opportunity of hearing and then decide the matter.

4.

Learned Counsel for the State submits that the Petitioner's claim would be examined after affording opportunity of hearing in terms of order dated 03.11.2017 passed in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra). 5.

Considering the aforesaid submission, this petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the Respondents for examination of Petitioner's claim in terms of order passed by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra) and to take appropriate decision thereon. 6.

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Bhola