← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6112/2018disposed off

Julious Khalkho v. South Eastern Coalfield Limited (Secl)

2018-09-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6112 of 2018 Julious Khalkho S/o Late Chhakke Lal, Aged About 31 Years, Posted And Serving As Electrical Fitter- Category IV (Labourer), Churcha (West) Churcha Colliery, District Korea, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner

Versus

1. South Eastern Coalfield Limited (Secl), Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director (Cmd), Secl Bhawan, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

2. General Manager (Personnel / Nee/pf/pension), South Eastern Coalfield Limited (Secl), Secl Bhawan, Seepat Road, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief General Manager, South Eastern Coalfield Limited (Secl), Baikunthpur, Area, Baikunthpur, District Korea, Chhattisgarh. ---Respondents For petitioner :

Shri Nimesh Kumar Jha, Advocate.

For State :

Shri K.P.S.Gandhi on behalf of Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 18/09/2018 1.

The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents have initiated a recruitment process for filling up the post of Security Guard and the petitioner is eligible for the said post but the applications which the petitioner has filled up is not being forwarded by respondent no.3 to respondent no.2. 2.

Given the limited grievance which the petitioner has raised, this Court does not intend to keep the petition pending rather ends of justice would serve if the writ petition is disposed of with a specific direction to respondent no.3 to ensure that if the petitioner is found eligible and suitable for

participating in the recruitment for the post of Security Guard and they have made applications in this regard, the same should be forwarded to the competent authority within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. While doing so respondent no.3 shall only ascertain whether the petitioner had filed their applications before the last date of submission of application or not. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner also to bring to the notice of the respondent no. 2 & 3 with respect to the order passed by this Court.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Sumit JUDGE