← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6745/2019disposed off

Savita Deewan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6745 of 2019 Savita Deewan W/o Late Shri Dhanendra Deewan Aged About 39 Years R/o Sector-29, Block No. 31, House No. 303, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Police Station And Post - Rakhi, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Thorough Its Secretary, Department Of Home (Police), Mahanadi, Mantralaya, Police Station And Post - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director General Of Police (D.G.P.) Police Headquarters (Phq), Near Mahanadi Mantralaya, Police Station And Post - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Additional Director General Of Police (A.D.G.P.) Administration, Police Headquarters (Phq), Near Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Police Station And Post - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Deputy Inspector General Of Police (D.I.G.P.) Administration, Police Headquarters (Phq), Near Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Police Station And Post - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Usha Netam Enquiry Officer, Deputy Superintendent Of Police (D.S.P.) Administration, Police Headquarters (Phq), Near Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Police Station And Post - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ayaz Naved, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 02/09/2019

1. The present writ petition though has been filed seeking for two reliefs, firstly for revocation of suspension and further for a final decision in the departmental enquiry at the earliest.

2. So far as revocation of suspension is concerned, this Court is reluctant to entertain the said prayer at this juncture as the

departmental enquiry initiated against the petitioner has already reached the fag end. The Additional Director General of Police earlier on 06.04.2019 itself had ordered for early conclusion of the departmental enquiry.

3. The counsel for the petitioner submits that all the material witnesses have been examined and the inquiry report also has been submitted and only an order has to be passed by the Disciplinary Authority.

4. Given the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the respondents No. 3 & 4 to ensure appropriate decision is taken on the departmental enquiry initiated against the petitioner based on the outcome of the inquiry report at the earliest preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved